Delivered maritime workflow

Broker-message
reconciliation

Extract information from broker correspondence, compare it with existing records and send the differences to the right person for review.

✉

Illustrative broker message

Vessel and fixture details from approved correspondence.

APPROVED INPUT
→
≡

Illustrative fixture record

Vessel
From source
Arrival
Amendment
Terms
Review required
STRUCTURED INFORMATION
→
!

Human review

Missing information
›
Conflicting details
›
ILLUSTRATIVE INTERFACE
INPUT

Approved broker messages and fixture records

OUTPUT

Structured information and exceptions for review

MEASURE OF VALUE

Handling time, matching quality and reviewer corrections

ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH · SAMPLE DATA

A difference worth
a closer look.

A review pattern for delivered broker reconciliation.

Broker reconciliation / Review workspace
1 exception
APPROVED SOURCES
↗
Broker message
Fixture amendment
≡
Fixture record
Accepted source
FIXTURE
DEMO–024
MV Northstar
Sample vessel
ARRIVAL TIME / FIELD 01
Needs review
Reviewer decision
Sample approved

An amended arrival.
One clear difference.

Check the source.
Confirm the amendment.

A recorded decision.
Ready for the next step.

The broker message proposes a different arrival time from the accepted fixture record.

A commercial reviewer compares the message, fixture match and proposed value before accepting the change.

The sample amendment has reviewer approval. In a real deployment, the agreed integration determines how an accepted update is handled.

ACCEPTED RECORD
18:00
LT
→
PROPOSED VALUE
19:30
LT
SAMPLE BROKER MESSAGE

“Please amend arrival to 19:30 local time.”

SAMPLE ACCEPTED FIXTURE RECORD

Arrival: 18:00 local time · DEMO–024 · MV Northstar

The accepted record changes only through the agreed approval process.

This is a simulated approval. No external system is connected.

Demo complete. Approval was simulated; no live fixture record was changed.

WORKFLOW
Capture
✓
Extract
✓
Compare
✓
Review
04
Update
05
Capture
✓
Extract
✓
Compare
✓
Review
✓
Update
→
CR
Commercial reviewer
Approval required
CONCEPT INTERFACE · NO LIVE SYSTEM CONNECTION
01 / 03
02 / 03
03 / 03
01 / CHARTERING

Keep up with the amendments.

One fixture can generate several messages and revised details. Commercial teams need to identify what changed, match it to the right record and decide which information to accept. That repeated review is the starting point.

02 / CHARTERING

See the source behind the difference.

The delivered workflow extracts fixture details and compares them with existing records. The review process surfaces exceptions before the agreed update process. The example below uses sample data to show how a reviewer could assess an amendment.

03 / CHARTERING

Fit the rules to your commercial process.

Agree vessel and fixture matching, amendments, duplicate handling, units and time zones. Establish which source is authoritative and how missing or conflicting information reaches the responsible person.

04 / CHARTERING

Build the business case from your baseline.

Measure handling time, reviewer effort, corrections and the full cost of operation. Test representative correspondence before expanding. Access to messaging platforms and voyage systems depends on the relevant permissions, interfaces and licences.

A FEW USEFUL ANSWERS

Before we start.

The clickthrough is an illustrative interface using sample records. It demonstrates a review pattern for a delivered workflow; it is not a customer production screenshot.

Updates depend on the agreed interface, permissions and approval process. Discovery establishes record ownership, failure handling and the actions in scope.

Agree extraction quality, record matching, reviewer corrections, handling time and operating cost against your current process.

YOUR NEXT WORKFLOW

Put a real task
on the table.

Bring the process, the people and the problem.
We’ll help define a useful starting point.

Scroll to Top